AN ANALYSIS OF THREE ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR ELEVENTH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Authors

  • Nursakina Husen
  • RR Hasti Robiasih
  • Imam Ghozali

Keywords:

Evaluation, English Textbook, Mukundan

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: (1) see whether the textbooks used for learning English meet the criteria of a good textbook and (2) reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the textbook. This research was conducted using content analysis because the data were collected from textbooks. Observation data through and document analysis. The data were analyzed through qualitative research. The object of this research is the English textbook used for class XI SMA students. The results of the study found that English to stop bullying currently fulfills the twelve criteria of a good textbook by Mukundan containing 1) Books related to syllabus and curriculum, 2) Methodology, 3) Suitability with students, 4) Physical and utilitarian attributes, and 5 ) Efficient spending of complementary materials, 6) General, 7) Speaking, 8) Reading, 9) Writing, 10) Vocabulary, 11) Grammar, and 12). Sports. Furthermore, the study also found that the advantages of English in relation to current bullying are providing appropriate communicative activities with students, providing teachers' books, and samples of material that are familiar to students. Meanwhile, the weakness of this textbook is that it does not provide assignments to develop students' listening and pronunciation skills. Also, the text and images are not up-to-date.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. 2008. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.(3rded). New Jersey: Pearson

Cunningsworth, A. 1995. Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemanm.

Hartoyo. 2011. Curriculum and Material Development: syllabus/course outline. Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof.DR. HAMKA

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

____________2016. Dokumen Kurikulum 2016. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Lawrence P.W. 2011. Texbook evaluation : a Framework for Evaluating the Fitness of the Hongkong New Secondary School Curiiculum. Hongkong : Hongkong University pers

Liamputtong, P. 2009. Qualitative research methods (3rd Edition). Autralia: Oxford University Press.

Littlejohn, A. 2005. The analysis of language teaching materials : inside the Trojan horse. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Miles, Mathew B. A. Michael Huberman. Jhonny Saldana 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: a methods sourcebook. America: United States of America

Mukundan, J., Nimehchisalem, V, & Hajimohammadi, R. 2011. Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist : A focus group discussion. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (12), 100-106.

Richards, J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development In Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

_________.2002. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

________.2013. Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal 44

Sugiyono.2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R dan D. Bandung : CV Alfabetta

Tomlinson, B. 2005. Material Development in Language Taeching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press

Downloads

Published

2020-11-05

How to Cite

Husen, N., Robiasih, R. H., & Ghozali, I. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF THREE ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR ELEVENTH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 5(4), 253–261. Retrieved from https://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/1320

Issue

Section

Articles