PENGARUH INSENTIF TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN DENGAN VARIABEL INTERVENING MOTIVASI KERJA PADA PT GANDA MADY INDOTAMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58487/akrabjuara.v7i1.1751Keywords:
path analysis, incentives, work motivation, employee performance, intervening variabelsAbstract
Incentives are needed to improve the motivation and performance of employees to always work optimally, so that the vision and mission of the organization / company can be achieved. This research aims to explain: 1) The Effect of Incentives on Employee Work Motivation; 2) Influence of Employee Performance Incentives; 3) The Effect of Work Motivation on Employee Performance, 4) The Significance of Work Motivation as an intervening between incentives and employee performance. This Explanatory Research conducted with a quantitative approach, using Regression-path analysis and Sobel analysis. The data used are primary data, obtained through online questionnaires (google form) as many as 30 samples which is the total population of outsourced employees of PT. Ganda Mady Indotama in the Pondok Labu AL-Izhar school area numbered 30 people. Variabels studied include Incentives, Work Motivation and Employee Performance. The results of the path analysis showed that the Incentive variabel (X) had a significant effect on Work Motivation (Y1) with a beta value of 0.677, the Incentive variabel (X) significantly affected Employee Performance (Y2) with a beta value of 0.279, the Work Motivation variabel (Y1) significantly affected Employee Performance (Y2) with a beta value of 0,650. Work motivation is proven to be variabel intervening in the relationship between the influence of incentive variabels on employee performance. The total effect of Incentives on Employee Performance through Work Motivation increased to 0.719. But its influence as an intervening is not significant because the p-value of the Sobel test of 0.071 is greater than 0.05.
Keyword: path analysis, incentives, work motivation, employee performance,
intervening variabels
Downloads
References
Amir, M. F. 2015. Memahami Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan, Konsep, dan Penilaian Kinerja di Perusahaan. Mitra Wacana Media.
Anggoro, M. A., Siburian, N. F., Sartika, R. D., Pasaribu, S., & Panggabean, R. P. A. 2020. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik, Penilaian Prestasi Kerja dan Pemberian Insentif terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PDAM Tirtanadi Cabang Sei Agul. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA …, 4(3), 728–738. http://journal.stiemb.ac.id/index.php/mea/article/view/491
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktek. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=801361
Arkho, A. 2015. PENGARUH INSENTIF MATERIIL DAN NON MATERIIL
TERHADAP MOTIVASI KERJA KARYAWAN (Studi pada Karywan PT. Kantor Pos (Persero) Malang).
Bangun, W. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Erlangga. Cooper, D., & Emory, W. C. 1997. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Erlangga. Darmawan. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Effendi, O. U. (2011). Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Prakteknya. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Eko, W. S. 2015. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ghozali, I. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.
Hasibuan, M. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Bumi Aksara.
Hatch, E., & Farhadi, H. 1981. Research Design & Statistic for Applied Linguistic.
Rahnama Publication.
Ivancevich, J. M. 2001. Human Resource Management. Mc Graw Hill. Kadarisman, M. 2012. Manajemen Kompensasi. Rajawali Pers.
Mangkunegara, A. P. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan.Remaja Rosda Karya
Panambunan, R., Lengkong, V., & Trang, I. 2018. Pengaruh Insentif Material, Insentif Non Material Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Karyawan Pt Bpr Prisma Dana Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 6(4), 3058–3067. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v6i4.21221.
Puspitasari, P., Isharijadi, & Sulistyowati, N. W. 2018. PENGARUH PELATIHAN KERJA DAN INSENTIF FINANSIAL TERHADAPKINERJA KARYAWAN PD BPR BANK DAERAH KABUPATEN MADIUN. Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi, 6.
Retnowati, N., & Muslichah, E. W. 2012. Manajemen Kompensasi. Karya Putra Darwati.
Riduwan, E. A. K. 2007. Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/10141/cara- menggunakan-dan-memaknai-analisis-jalur-path-analysis-.html
Riniwati, H. 2011. Mendongkrak Motivasi dan Kinerja: Pendekatan Pemberdayaan SDM. UB Press.
Rivai, V. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. PT Raja Grafindo.
Salbiah, S., & Mahardika, B. 2017. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Kependidikan. 14.
Sarwoko, E. 2005. Analisis jalur pengaruh karakteristik pekerjaan, motivasi, kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan. Modernisasi, 1(1), 11–26.
Sarwoto. 2012. Dasar Dasar Organisasi dan Manajemen (16th ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.
Sondang, S. P. 2003. Teori dan Praktek Kepemimpinan. Rineka Cipta Jakarta.
Subianto, M. 2016. Pengaruh Gaji dan Insentif Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Serba Mulia Auto di Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Ejournal Administrasi Bisnis, 4, 698–712.
Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. CV Alfabeta. Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Method). Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.
Sulaksono, H. 2015. Budaya Organisasi dan Kinerja. Deepublish Publisher.
Sutrisno. 2012. Manajemen Keuangan Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi. EKONISIA. Syahyuti. 2010. Definisi, Variabel, Indikator, dan Pengukuran dalam Ilmu Sosial.Bina Rena Pariwara.
Tarigan, D. I. 2019. Pengaruh Insentif Material dan Insentif Non Material Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Abadi Jaya Bersama Medan.
Yani, M. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Mitra Wacana Media
