LEGAL CERTAINTY OF TIKTOK ACCOUNTS AS DEBT GUARANTEE OBJECTS IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY ERA
Keywords:
TikTok Account, Digital Assets, Debt Collateral, Social MediaAbstract
The digital era has given rise to new intangible assets, including social media accounts such as TikTok, which now hold significant economic value through monetization, endorsements, and commercial partnerships. This phenomenon triggers a legal urgency regarding the legal status of TikTok accounts as objects of property rights and their potential as loan collateral. Utilizing a normative legal research method with various approaches—statutory, conceptual, and comparative—this study examines the position of TikTok accounts under the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata) and the mechanisms for their execution as collateral. The findings indicate that, conceptually, a TikTok account is classified as an intangible movable asset that can be legally transferred through access control. Despite its potential as collateral, the lack of explicit regulation necessitates legal updates and a reform of property law in Indonesia to accommodate these digital assets.
Downloads
References
Dian Cahayani dan Merlin Swantamalo Magna, “Fungsi Akta Notaris dalam Lisensi HKI: Perspektif Fidusia”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 51, No. 3 (2021), hlm. 666.
Febriyanti, S. A., Setiasih, E. N., Salsabila, S. D., Rhama, B., & Thareq, S. I. (n.d.). Hubungan Intensitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Tiktok Dengan Motivasi Akademik Mahasiswa Generasi Z.
Gomez, Clifford. Banking and Finance: Theory, Law and Practice (New Dehli, Asoke K. Ghosh, PHI Learning Private Limited, 2011), 332-333.
Hariyani, Iswi; Cita Yustisia Serfiyani; dan Serfianto D. Purnomo. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit. (Yogyakarta, ANDI, 2018), 150.
Hendrayana, Made Yunanta, dkk. op. cit., 76.
Ibid, Pasal 1132
J. Satrio, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2019), hlm. 91, 165.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Burgerlijke Wetboek], diterjemahkan oleh R. Soebekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Pasal 1131 dan Pasal 1131.
Kurniawan, Kevin Ho dan Adeline Melanie. “Pelaksanaan Pengenaan Pajak Terhdap Tiktoker Serta Hambatannya di Indonesia.” Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan 7, No. 2 (2022): 70- 71.
Kurnianingrum, Trias Palupi. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Intellectual Property as Banking Credit Guarantee.” Negara Hukum 8, No. 1 (2017): 46.
Lana, Viskha Purwita, dkk. Op.cit., 9.
Nathania, Ninabelle, Dewa Ayu, dan Dian Sawitri. 2022. “Konten Tiktok Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia: Perspektif Hak Cipta.” Dalam Jurnal Kertha Wicara, vol. 11.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005).
Pradina, Ni Putu Radha dan I Made Dedy Priyanto. “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Kreator Tiktok Atas Konten Ciptaannya Sebagai Karya Sinematografi.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9, No.11 (2021): 2165-2166.
Rani Ayuningtyas Sutikno, A., Sabiq, F., Nashirudin, M., & Raden Mas Said Surakarta, U. (2024). Analisis Konten Youtube sebagai Jaminan Fidusia pada Perbankan Syariah.
Rahmatullah, Indra. Op.cit., (141).
Rahmatullah, Indra. Op.cit., (142).
Rumintjap, Ria Novalia, “Eksekusi Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor”, Lex Privatum, Vol.III, No. 1 (2015), hlm. 183.
Susanto Daniel. (2021). Model Aisas Untuk Memetakan Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Berdasarkan Kualitas Konten Tiktok #Racunshopee. 45–50.
Setianingrum, Reni Budi. “Mekanisme Penentuan Nilai Ekonomi dan Pengikatan Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, No. 2 (2016): 233.
Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, UU No. 2 Tahun 2014, LN Tahun 2014.
Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Pasal 1 UU No. 42 Tahun 1999.
Usman, Rachmadi, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018), hlm. 3 – 4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
