COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS IN FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58487/akrabjuara.v11i2.2790Keywords:
family disputes, comparative law, mediation, legal systems, international lawAbstract
Family dispute resolution is an essential component of the legal system that reflects the social, cultural, and legal values of a country. This study aims to analyze the comparison of family dispute resolution systems across different countries using a comparative law approach. The method employed is normative legal research with a comparative analysis of several legal systems, namely civil law, common law, and Islamic law. The results indicate that there are significant differences in the mechanisms for resolving family disputes, both through litigation and alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation. Countries adopting the common law system tend to emphasize flexibility and mediation, whereas civil law systems rely more on structured formal judicial processes. Meanwhile, the Islamic legal system highlights deliberation and reconciliation as primary approaches. This research is expected to provide a global perspective for the development of family dispute resolution systems in Indonesia
Downloads
References
Alexy, R. (2002). A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ali, Z. (2006). Hukum perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Arifin, Z. (2015). Hukum keluarga di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana. Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MK
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2012). Hukum konstitusi. Malang: Setara Press.
Bell, J. (2006). French legal cultures. London: Butterworths.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. (1981). Forum shopping and shopping forums. Journal of Legal Pluralism.
Black, H. C. (1990). Black’s law dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing.
Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cane, P. (2011). The heart of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappelletti, M. (1993). Access to justice and the welfare state. Florence: European University Institute.
Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and the economic challenge. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.
Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2004). Law and economics. Boston: Pearson.
Cotterrell, R. (1992). The sociology of law: An introduction. London: Butterworths.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
David, R., & Brierley, J. (1985). Major legal systems in the world today. London: Stevens & Sons.
Emery, R. E. (2012). Renegotiating family relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
Esposito, J. L. (2002). What everyone needs to know about Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. New York: Penguin Books.
Friedman, L. M. (2005). The legal system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-teori besar dalam hukum. Jakarta: Kencana
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glendon, M. A. (1989). The transformation of family law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, S., Sander, F., Rogers, N., & Cole, S. (2012). Dispute resolution. New York: Aspen.
Goode, W. J. (1982). The family. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harahap, M. Y. (2018). Hukum acara perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Herring, J. (2015). Family law. London: Pearson.
Hooker, M. B. (1975). Legal pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari’ah law. Oxford: Oneworld.
Kelsen, H. (2006). Pure theory of law. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange.
Kusumaatmadja, M. (2002). Konsep hukum dalam pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.
Llewellyn, K. N. (1960). The common law tradition. Boston: Little Brown.
MacCormick, N. (2007). Institutions of law: An essay in legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahfud MD. (2010). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). Mediation. Harvard Law Review.
Menski, W. (2006). Comparative law in a global context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merryman, J. H. (2007). The civil law tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mnookin, R. (2003). Beyond winning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyadi, L. (2017). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode penelitian ilmu hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society. New York: Harper & Row.
Parkinson, P. (2011). Family law and the indissolubility of parenthood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1998). Economic analysis of law. New York: Aspen.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahman, F. (2010). Islamic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. B. W. (2003). Hukum sebagai suatu sistem. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Riskin, L. (2002). Understanding mediation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review.
Roberts, M. (2014). Mediation in family disputes. London: Ashgate.
Salim, H. S. (2014). Perkembangan teori dalam ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Satjipto Rahardjo. (2006). Ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Shidarta. (2013). Hukum penalaran hukum. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2007). Sosiologi hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Subekti. (2005). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2009). Penemuan hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutiyoso, B. (2006). Metode penemuan hukum. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Syarifuddin, A. (2006). Hukum perkawinan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Twining, W. (2009). General jurisprudence: Understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Umar, H. (2003). Metode penelitian. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Unger, R. M. (1976). Law in modern society: Toward a criticism of social theory. New York: Free Press.
Usman, H. (2008). Manajemen teori praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Waluyo, B. (2002). Penelitian hukum dalam praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Watson, A. (1993). Legal transplants: An approach to comparative law. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Widnyana, I. M. (2010). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Jakarta: Fikahati.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum paradigma metode. Jakarta: Elsam.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
